04/12/2008 (8:03 pm)
Mark-to-market complaints fall on deaf ears
Despite complaints that rules requiring companies to value assets at current prices has worsened the credit crisis, U.S. accounting rule-makers appear unwilling to do any backpedaling.
New rules on mark-to-market, or “fair value” accounting, took full effect this year, forcing companies to use a new framework to value their hardest-to-price assets.
In a best-case scenario those values are based on price quotes in an active market, but often companies have to rely on management’s best estimation using mathematical models.
Companies believe the new rules have increased volatility in financial statements and led to a downward spiral, where every write-down of their asset-backed securities met shocked investors who stopped trading, leading to further writedowns.
But the Financial Accounting Standards Board feels investors are benefiting from more information about the riskiest assets no teletrack payday loans.
“We at the FASB, sometimes like to view ourselves as in the communication business — we like to make sure that investors are getting what they need,” said Russell Golden, director of FASB’s technical application and implementation activities, during a Thursday panel discussion in New York.
In fact, a March survey of more than 2,000 investors from the CFA Institute found that 79 percent feel the new fair value requirements improve transparency and investor understanding.
Although FASB has budged on other rules in the past, last year it refused requests to delay implementation of the new fair value rules for financial assets and seems unlikely to change anything now.