05/29/2010 (12:12 am)

Sonnenschein to combine with British law firm

Filed under: business |

Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, a law firm based in Chicago, will combine with London-based Denton Wilde Sapte LLP if partners vote to approve.

The combined firm will be known as SNR Denton and will have more than 1,400 lawyers in 18 countries. The heads of each firm will serve as co-chief executive officers, according to the joint statement.

If approved, it will be the second major combination of a U.S. and U.K. firm in the past year. On May 1, Washington-based Hogan & Hartson and London-based Lovells LLP joined to create Hogan Lovells, a 2,500-lawyer firm with about 40 offices, according to its website.

"Looking back in history, it is relatively rare to see transcontinental mergers," said Kent Zimmermann, a consultant with Zeughauser Group. "It’s been telling that there have been two recently. Globalization is the number one thing affecting the economy, and the number one thing affecting law firms."

Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal has had a St. Louis area office since 1990. It opened with one lawyer but now has nearly 50 lawyers on staff, said Jennifer A. Marler, the local office’s managing partner.

The firm’s partnership with Denton would have no immediate effect on the St. Louis office, she said.

Marler said she was pleased that the agreement would give the firm an international base of lawyers from whom to seek advice and counsel, and could help create future growth options for the firm as a whole.

Denton handles work for clients in energy, transport and infrastructure, financial institutions, real estate and retail and technology, media and telecommunications sectors, according to the firm’s website. It has offices in the Middle East, Europe and southeast Asia.

Robert Kelly of the Post-Dispatch contributed to this report.

Source

05/25/2010 (9:57 am)

St. Louis must do more to spark startups to thrive after recession

Filed under: marketing |

Right now, there is one thing St. Louis needs more than anything: jobs.

The recession destroyed more than 75,000 of them. We weren’t creating so many before it started, either.

And where do jobs come from? Small business.

Despite their headline-grabbing nature, big companies have been shedding workers in St. Louis for decades. Since 1993, the region’s net job generation has come from firms with fewer than 100 employees. They have generated 114,000 jobs, almost as many as the big companies have cut. And it’s not just jobs. Increasingly, small firms generate the ideas and innovations that power our economy.

Yet we’re not launching as many small businesses as we ought to be. St. Louis continues to lag behind the nation in the establishment of new companies. During the past decade, the metro area has remained in the bottom quarter of big cities. On its index of entrepreneurial activity over the last three years, the Kauffman Foundation last week ranked Missouri 45th out of the 50 states. People here are half as likely to be self-employed — a key sign of startup activity — as in leading states such as Georgia and Arizona.

"We’ve been low in this regard for a long, long time," said Jerry Katz, a professor of entrepreneurship at St. Louis University.

And there’s good reason to believe this is holding St. Louis back. Look at faster-growing regions, such as Denver, say, or Dallas. They grow more companies and more jobs. Research earlier this year from Kauffman found that new firms — those less than five years old — have accounted for all new jobs added since 1980.

Growth isn’t so much from the big boys’ getting bigger, as the little guys’ growing up. And the places where they grow up will benefit.

Too often, that’s not St. Louis. But it hasn’t always been this way.

There was a time when this city was a leader in innovation and entrepreneurship. Jason Hall, director of the Missouri Technology Corp., points out that seven of the state’s 10 biggest companies — such as Emerson Electric Co., Monsanto, Leggett and Platt — were founded by individual businessmen, most of them more than a hundred years ago.

"We’re still living off them today," Hall said.

Indeed, big companies launched a century ago have sustained St. Louis ever since, and spread their wealth around the region. They funded its universities and museums. They founded Civic Progress to help tackle St. Louis’ problems. They built this city into a prosperous big-company town, a hub for the Fortune 500, flush with steady jobs.

But some say St. Louis got too comfortable, too reliant on its stable of hometown corporate icons.

"We had solid businesses making solid profits, and everyone was pretty content," said Katz. "St. Louis’ culture didn’t really support innovation."

And then, as we know, those icons faded.

Our global airline — TWA — disappeared. Local stalwarts from Purina to May Department Stores to A.G. Edwards were taken over by bigger competitors with a different hometown. Even Anheuser-Busch is not what it was, as the company has cut jobs under new ownership.

St. Louis does have its next-generation success stories — such as pharmacy benefit manager Express Scripts and Enterprise Rent-a-Car — but they have yet to fill the big shoes of their predecessors. And that has local leaders looking for answers. The trouble, some say, is that those answers too often revolve around luring other big companies.

Alan Richter has been beating the drum for entrepreneurship for years, including nearly a decade running the region’s Small Business Development Center. Most of that time, he has watched civic leaders in St. Louis and state officials in Jefferson City spend their energies, and their resources, trying to land the big fish from someplace else cash advance companies.

Look at all the big incentive programs, Richter says, the tax breaks for big job generation, the credits for real estate development. Such economic tools are designed to make Missouri attractive to the big employer, not to grow the small.

"It runs through our entire economic development strategy," Richter said. "We’re not as committed to growing small businesses as we are to stealing from somewhere else."

That’s starting to change, local economic development officials say. They realize that attracting big companies to the region is a tough, expensive, often fruitless game, and they say they’re bulking up their small business development efforts to provide more balance.

"It’s not an either/or situation. You want a balanced portfolio," said Denny Coleman, president of the St. Louis County Economic Council. "You want diversity of size and kind of companies."

And it’s not as if there’s a shortage of people with good ideas that could lead to good business.

Coleman’s agency recently partnered with Edward Jones to launch a business plan competition, to find the best entrepreneurs with the best ideas and help them grow. And by "help," they mean award $100,000 in prize money and top-flight consulting help to three winners.

They were hoping for maybe 50 applicants, he said. They received 226.

That’s a good sign that there are many ideas out there, Coleman said. And a reminder that St. Louis needs to build on them.

"This region is being forced to think more entrepreneurially," he said. "Downsizing and right-sizing has forced out a lot of good people. But there are other opportunities."

Coleman has been watching this shift developing for 20 years. In the early ’90s, he chaired the region’s efforts to recover from the massive cuts at McDonnell Douglas, by far St. Louis’ biggest employer until defense cuts pulverized its work force. Twenty-seven thousand people lost their jobs. Suppliers and subcontractors lost their main client. Everyone had to think differently.

"For decades, some companies’ marketing strategy was to wait for McDonnell to call them," Coleman said. "That went away."

The county and others worked with these companies, to help them think anew about what kind of services they could provide and to whom; to become more nimble, more flexible, more entrepreneurial. They also launched retraining and placement programs for the laid-off, about 10 percent of whom decided to start their own businesses.

Indeed, a big chunk of the region’s small business infrastructure — the World Trade Center, its largest tech incubator, a key county loan fund — came out of the post-McDonnell adjustment period, Coleman notes.

Those resources are perhaps even more important today, as the region endures a transition that is at least as wrenching as those post-Cold War days. So many of St. Louis’ remaining big employers — from carmakers to banks to retailers — have been battered in the recession. And the big companies that are growing haven’t been able to make up for the losses.

That makes entrepreneurship even more important these days, said Dane Stengler, a senior research analyst at Kauffman.

If St. Louis hopes to build back the 75,000 jobs it lost, and give those who would build a new economy the opportunity to do it here, it needs to sharpen its focus on small business.

"It’s not a silver bullet," Stengler said. "But a strong and sustained recovery simply won’t happen without it."

Source

05/23/2010 (7:39 pm)

St. Louis County Cab unveils ‘text for taxi’

Filed under: legal |

Need a cab? Just text.

St. Louis County Cab/Yellow Cab, the area’s largest taxi company, has rolled “text for taxi.”

Customers can text their pick-up address and ZIP code to 971-TAXI (8294).

President Basil Rudawsky said the company was the first locally to offer the text service.

Customers also can order a cab online.

“We have received great feedback from our customers,” Rudawsky said.

St. Louis County Cab/Yellow Cab is owned and operated by Tom Gregerson and has a fleet of more than 250 vehicles.

Source

05/18/2010 (11:06 pm)

Apple iPhone seen winning bank business

Filed under: news |

British bank Standard Chartered is reportedly shifting thousands of its bankers to Apple Inc.'s iPhone from Research in Motion Ltd.'s Blackberry devices.

"It's a group-wide initiative involving wholesale and consumer banks globally," a spokeswoman for Standard Chartered told Reuters.

Bankers until now have for the most part been restricted to RIM's (NASDAQ:RIMM) BlackBerry as the standard device issued by their firms, largely because of security concerns with Apple's (NASDAQ:AAPL) smartphone in the past.

"If more companies switch to the iPhone, this is of course bad news for RIM," Lu Chialin, an analyst at Macquarie Securities told Reuters. "However, it will take a long time for companies to do their own internal testing before deciding to change, so it will be a while before it has any effect on RIM."

A study by NPD Group last week said RIM was No. 1 in first quarter U.S. market share with 36 percent, with Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) No. 2 at 28 percent and Apple No. 3 at 21 percent.

Source

05/13/2010 (8:48 pm)

Whole Foods picks co-CEO, COO and president

Filed under: technology |

Two Whole Foods Markets Inc. (Nasdaq: WFMI) executives were promoted today and one was added to the company's board of directors.

Co-Presidents and Chief Operating Officers Walter Robb and A.C. Gallo were granted their own titles Thursday. The two have shared the roles since October 2004.

Robb was elevated to co-CEO with founder John Mackey and joins the Austin-based natural grocer's board, while Gallo goes on as sole president and COO.

"Walter and A.C. are brilliant retailers, and their contributions to Whole Foods Market's success have been immeasurable. Due in large part to their operational leadership, we successfully managed through 2009, the most difficult year in our company's 30-year history," Mackey said.

Robb started working for Whole Foods in 1991 after selling his operating lease for the future Mill Valley, Calif. store. He ended up opening and operating that store as a team leader until his promotion to president of the northern pacific region in July 1993. Under his leadership, the region grew from two to 17 stores, completed four acquisitions and was a top-performing region for five years.

Robb became executive vice president of operations in 2001, co-COO in 2003 and co-president in 2004.

Gallo transferred to Whole Foods after 15 years with Bread & Circus, which was acquired by Whole Foods in 1992. He was promoted to vice president of the northeast region in 1994 and then to president in 1996. During his tenure, the Northeast region grew from eight stores to 16, including two acquisitions and the first New York City story.

Gallo became executive vice president of operations in 2001, co-chief operating officer in 2003 and co-president in 2004.

Whole Foods posted its quarterly earnings Wednesday, posting 147 percent net income growth.

Source

05/12/2010 (4:54 pm)

Two Phoenix companies among Inner City 100 winners

Filed under: money |

Two Phoenix companies have been selected for the 2010 Inner City 100, a list of the fastest-growing inner-city businesses in the U.S. compiled by the Initiative for a Competitive Inner City and Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

The program recognizes successful inner city companies and their CEOs as role models for entrepreneurship, innovative business practices and job creation in America’s urban communities.

The two Phoenix companies selected are Auction Systems Auctioneers and Appraisers (No. 27) and Meyer and Lundahl Manufacturing Co. (No. 67).

The rankings were announced at an awards dinner on Wednesday in Boston bad credit pay day loans.

“The Inner City 100 winning companies exemplify America’s remarkable potential and the road to future economic recovery,” Mary Kay Leonard, president and CEO of ICIC. “These extraordinary companies demonstrate the market possibilities that exist within our inner cities. If we can leverage these possibilities, we can create jobs, income and wealth for local residents and produce the next chapter of American innovation and opportunity.”

Source

05/06/2010 (7:18 am)

Airlines may merge, but the troubles stay the same

Filed under: management |

One would think that the merger of United and Continental airlines, a marriage that would create the world’s largest carrier, would be enough to rouse shareholders knocked unconscious by years of losses. But while the companies’ shares both gained more than 2% following Monday’s announcement, the news still held all the excitement and economic potential of a two-family garage sale.

That’s not to say that the airlines, and the industry overall, aren’t in desperate need of consolidation should they ever hope to earn a consistent profit. It’s just that the joining of two companies with rickety balance sheets, below-investment-grade bond ratings and a dubious history of making money is hardly the type of event that gets the investment world leaping from its Herman Miller chairs.

"It’s not the kind of behemoth that it would have looked like 20 years ago," says Robert Poole, director of transportation policy at the non-partisan Reason Foundation. "Airlines are kind of has-beens."

That fact can be best told in the numbers: The combined airline’s estimated post-merger market capitalization of $8 billion is 3% of Apple Computer’s, based on Monday’s close. Airlines as a whole lost $50 billion in the last decade. In this industry, mergers are more like a wounded man trading in one crutch for a pair: It’ll be easier for him to get around, but he’ll be no less hobbled.

Where’s Justice?

Not surprisingly, given the industry’s troubles, it’s hard to imagine that even a more labor- and consumer-friendly Justice Department — as opposed to the Bush-appointed crew that approved the Delta-Northwest merger in 2008 — will put up much resistance to the United-Continental deal.

And that’s not just because of the relative dearth of route overlap between the two airlines — a grand total of seven routes in the third quarter of 2009, according to data provided by Oliver Wyman’s planestats.com. The difficulty in shrinking capacity within the current industry structure argues heavily in favor of further concentration.

Industrywide capacity shrunk 8% from 2007 to 2009, but it was too little to offset cratering demand caused by the recession. Even with planes being parked in the desert, average airfares dropped approximately 8% during the same period, according to the BTS. "There in no pricing power. None," said industry analyst Vaughn Cordle of Washington, D.C.-based Airline Forecasts.

A marriage of convenience

So shouldn’t this mega-merger be the kind of jolt that finally gives airlines the ability to raises prices (instead of just adding on ridiculous fees) and get out of the jam? It’s one thing to take out a few seats; it’s another to be able to rid yourself of planes en masse.

Well, not exactly. For one, airline mergers are notoriously tricky. The pilots of US Airways and America West, who merged in 2005, are still fighting over who has seniority.

And even a united United-Continental won’t have that much sway. A decade ago, the major carriers controlled 80% of the market; by the end of this year it will be closer to 50% and Cordle sees it soon heading to 40%. Consolidation isn’t about increasing power, it’s about staying alive.

Cordle’s firm estimates that without the merger, the five current legacy carriers — Delta-Northwest, American, United, Continental and US Airways — face $20 billion in additional costs by 2014 from rising fuel prices, airport facility charges and security and labor hikes. The United-Continental merger should allow those airlines alone to save $3 billion in such costs, he said.

Even one of the industry’s low-cost competitors welcomes the merger. Virginia Gambale, a director at JetBlue, said the company is pleased with the deal, noting that the industry’s fragile state and mercurial fortunes make it difficult to engage in long-term planning. "As we deal with less players in the market, it makes it easier to decide where and how we will compete," she said. "Uncertainty breeds its own inefficiency." 

Source