Finance and Economic

Venezuelan state oil firm PDVSA told a UK court on Friday that a $12 billion freeze on its assets should not have been granted to Exxon Mobil (XOM.N: Quote, Profile, Research) as the oil major’s arguments were “sheer fantasy land”.

PDVSA lawyer Gordon Pollock said the amount frozen was excessive. He said a claim that PDVSA would try to hide its assets was not credible and the English court which awarded the freeze had exceeded its jurisdiction.

Pollock said the $12 billion figure Exxon asked to be frozen was based on adding up all the projected cash flows of the Venezuelan heavy oil project seized by President Hugo Chavez as part of his nationalization drive, without any discount made for the fact they run to 2035.

He said this argument was “simply economically and financially illiterate.”

“There’s only one way to describe that argument and that’s ‘weird’.”

He said any amount Exxon could claim legitimately was “an absolute tadpole” compared to the $12 billion which the U.S online cash advance. major oil company managed to have frozen so that compensation could be secured if it won arbitration over its lost oil fields.

He said the U.S. company justified the need for the freeze by alleging bad faith on the part of the Venezuelan government and by claiming state oil company PDVSA could rapidly sell its refineries and pipelines around the world and stash the cash away from Exxon’s grasp.

“This is sheer fantasy land,” he said. “Refineries don’t get up in the middle of the night and sneak away across the border.” 

Read more